Key takeaways
- The GEO Score measures nine research-backed signals — not generic SEO metrics — that predict whether ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity can cite your content
- Scores below 45 usually mean technical blockers (AI bots disallowed, missing llms.txt, weak schema) that you can fix in an afternoon
- Scores between 45 and 65 typically need content structure work — answer capsules, headings, and statistics attribution
- A single page score is a snapshot; compare competitors on the same URL type (blog vs product page) for a fair benchmark
- Re-running the checker after fixes lets you validate progress before you invest in paid rewriting or monitoring
Most SEO tools tell you how Google might rank you. The GEO Score Checker tells you something different: whether AI engines can find, parse, and cite your content when a buyer asks a question in ChatGPT, Claude, or Perplexity.
The score is a 0–100 composite across nine signals drawn from GEO research (Princeton/Georgia Tech, GEO Alliance benchmarks, and operational data from active campaigns). This guide explains what each signal means, what to fix first, and how to interpret your results without chasing the wrong metrics.
What the Overall Score Means
| Grade | Score | Typical situation |
|---|---|---|
| A | 65–100 | Strong extractability; focus on topical depth and monitoring |
| B | 55–64 | Solid base; a few high-impact content gaps remain |
| C | 45–54 | Mixed technical and content signals — fixable in 1–2 weeks |
| D | 35–44 | Major structural gaps; AI crawlers may be blocked or starved of context |
| F | Below 35 | Critical technical failures; unlikely to be cited until resolved |
A low score is not a verdict on your brand — it is a map. Many well-designed sites score poorly on GEO because they were built for human readers and Google snippets, not for verbatim extraction by language models.
9
signals in the GEO Score — covering technical access, structure, and content extractability
GeoFundamentals GEO Score methodology, 2026
Run a free GEO Score on any URL — results in under 30 seconds
GEO Score Checker
30-second analysis · 9 signals · no account needed
Signal 1 — AI Bot Access (robots.txt)
What it checks: Whether GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, and related crawlers are allowed to fetch your pages.
Why it matters: If bots are blocked, your content may never enter the retrieval pool AI apps use — regardless of quality.
Fix first if: You score zero or partial here. Often a single Disallow rule or legacy SEO plugin is the culprit.
See exactly which AI crawlers your robots.txt allows
AI Bot Checker
Checks 9 crawlers · see your robots.txt rules instantly
Signal 2 — llms.txt Presence and Quality
What it checks: Whether yourdomain.com/llms.txt exists, is discoverable, and describes your site in factual terms AI systems can use.
Why it matters: llms.txt is the fastest way to tell models what your site is about and which pages matter most.
Fix first if: You have no file or a two-line stub. The llms.txt guide walks through a complete template.
Signal 3 — Schema Markup (Especially FAQPage)
What it checks: JSON-LD structured data — FAQPage, Article, HowTo — that clarifies entities and Q&A pairs for machines.
Why it matters: FAQ schema in particular aligns with how models surface direct answers (1.8× citation multiplier in GEO research for FAQ-style content).
Generate FAQPage and Article schema — copy-paste ready
Schema Markup Generator
FAQPage · Article · HowTo · copy-paste ready
Signal 4 — Heading Hierarchy
What it checks: One H1, logical H2/H3 structure, and headings that map to real user questions.
Why it matters: Models use headings to segment content for retrieval. Skipped levels and vague titles reduce extractability.
Signal 5 — Answer Capsules
What it checks: Whether sections after H2s open with a 40–60 word direct-answer paragraph.
Why it matters: This is the highest single content lever (+43% citation rate in controlled studies).
Generate cite-ready capsules for any heading on your site
Answer Capsule Generator
Paste any heading · get a cite-ready paragraph in seconds
Signal 6 — Statistics and Attribution
What it checks: Claims backed by named sources, years, and specificity — not “studies show” without attribution.
Why it matters: Attributed statistics increase perceived authority (+33% in GEO experiments).
Signal 7 — FAQ Section
What it checks: A dedicated FAQ block with real buyer questions and concise answers.
Why it matters: FAQ content matches conversational query patterns in AI search.
Signal 8 — Content Fluency and Length
What it checks: Readability, paragraph length, and whether the page has enough depth to be worth citing.
Why it matters: Thin or cluttered pages are passed over even when technically accessible.
Signal 9 — Expert Attribution and E-E-A-T Signals
What it checks: Named experts, clear authorship, and topical consistency with the page’s subject.
Why it matters: Models weight identifiable expertise when choosing between similar sources.
How to Prioritise Fixes (The 80/20 Order)
The fastest path to a higher score
Work in this order unless the checker flags a critical fail: (1) allow AI bots, (2) deploy llms.txt, (3) add FAQPage schema to key URLs, (4) add answer capsules to top H2s, (5) attribute statistics. Most sites gain 15–25 points from technical + schema alone before rewriting full articles.
GEO Score improvement checklist
- Run GEO Score on your homepage and one money page (product or service)
- Run the same check on a competitor’s equivalent page — note the gap
- Fix AI bot access and deploy llms.txt if either fails
- Add FAQPage schema to your top 5 URLs
- Add answer capsules to every H2 on those pages
- Re-run GEO Score and save results while signed in (Growth: full history)
Competitor Comparison on the Same Tool
The checker’s compare against a competitor mode runs the same nine signals on a rival URL. Use it to answer one question: on this page type, who is more extractable?
Fair comparisons match intent — blog vs blog, pricing vs pricing. A 58 vs 41 gap on a like-for-like URL is a stronger sales story than comparing your homepage to their documentation subsite.
What the Score Does Not Measure
The GEO Score does not guarantee citations, predict Google rankings, or measure brand sentiment in model answers. It measures readiness — whether you have done the work that makes citation possible.
For ongoing proof that models actually mention your brand, you need citation monitoring (weekly keyword checks across engines), not a one-off audit.
Track whether ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity cite your brand every week
AI Citation Alert
ProWeekly digest · monitors ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity · Pro plan
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a good GEO Score in 2026? For a key revenue page, 55+ is a reasonable target after initial fixes; 65+ indicates strong extractability. Broader sites often have a mix — audit per template, not one global number.
How often should I re-check? After any major publish or technical change, and at least quarterly. Growth subscribers can store history in their account to spot trends.
Does a high GEO Score mean ChatGPT will cite me? Not automatically — but it removes the most common structural reasons sites are ignored. Citations also depend on topical authority and competition for the query.
Can I improve my score without a developer? Yes. Bot access, llms.txt, schema, and answer capsules are achievable without engineering for most CMS platforms.
How does this relate to SEO? Complementary. See GEO vs SEO for where signals overlap and diverge.